Political elections often have a way of sneakily attacking American citizens. In his article "Put Up Hurricane Shutters for the Political Wind," Barry's humor criticizes America's apathetic views of issues until in involves one's self. Barry utilizes exaggerations and satire to compare this American fault to the Florida clamor of hurricanes.
In the beginning of his essay, Barry describes Florida citizens that don't believe "[hurricanes aren't] going to affect" their lives until "local TV weather people" begin tracking the storm and urging citizens to prepare at the last minute. Like wise, citizens "didn't pay attention" to political candidates until the "horrible truth" hit the citizens that the candidates would be arriving there soon for primaries. By comparing these caucuses to hurricanes, Barry establishes a connection with the readers who are most likely Floridians. This humorous comparison also addresses citizen's ignorant inability to prepare for significant events in society. This idea is further emphasized as he describes the caucuses in Iowa, a "distant place" that is "always [confused] with Kansas" and other midwestern states. Barry exaggerates America's inattentiveness to imply citizens' ignorance to the outside world. They feel more comfortable in a tiny bubble.
Barry continues to breakdown his analogy as he describes Florida residents who "wisely prepare" for hurricanes but even with "plenty of warning," citizens "sit around like morons" as it "slams directly" into them. Barry's humor criticizes the American way of preparing thoroughly for events that have a history of being less catastrophic than what they are believed to be but the inability to prepare for a democratic event that occurs regularly. This criticism also emphasizes the idea that citizens aren't holding up the American ideals. Barry persists this idea using satire by claiming the only way to "protect yourself from a presidential primary" is to fasten plywood "firmly to every TV screen." There is no way to avoid presidential primaries. They must be faced head on. Instead of ignoring the political world, Barry implies that American's should be informed from the very beginning to comprehend the situation when primaries arrive in their state.
Barry concludes his essay by advising readers to "have a plan" before the next time "[they] get nailed again." Barry indirectly suggests to the reader to become active and engaged in politics next time around to avoid confusion and to have an understanding off all political candidates. His ends his essay with more advice to assist the "millions of innocent Americans" in the path of the presidential storms, even Barry himself is "willing to donate...canned meat." Barry's consistent use of humor again encourages his audience to end their passiveness and become involved in politics.
Barry encourages his audiences to become active, ideal American citizens to have a trickle effect on the nation. These ideal citizens will be well informed of public issues and politicians and influence other passive citizens to also become engaged in the community outside their bubble. By seeing past the horizons, America will be much less ignorant and capable of making informed decisions and managing priorities.
Tuesday, February 28, 2012
Thursday, February 9, 2012
"Kill 'Em! Crush 'Em! Eat 'Em Raw!"
1. John McMurtry's essay begins with a personal anecdote about the results of playing sports- especially football- since childhood. When he can no longer ignore his physical condition, he seeks treatment and is hospitalized. How does the anecdote lend credibility to his argument.
McMurty's anecdote lends ethos to his argument as he his played "college and professional football" and now "[has] to don a brace" and his brother "an outstanding football player in college" had to "[undergo] spinal surgery." This personal experience aren't just "isolated experiences" but are common and are the consequence of football, lending credibility to the argument.
2. McMurtry also addresses the argument that games such as football allow us to discharge our "original-sin urge into less harmful channels than, say, war" (para. 15). Cite passages where McMurtry counters this arugment. Do you agree with him? Why or why not?
McMurtry "[sees] little to recommend such a view" that sports are a more peaceful channel. "organized football" only "[suppressed his] natural urges" and express them in "an alienating, violent for." While football can often be a good energy outlet, it often takes peaceful men and turns them into mean, crushing machines.
3. Who is McMurtry's audience? Is it necessary for the reader to understand or care about football in order to understand what McMurtry is saying about society? Explain.
McMurtry's argument could be directed at most anyone is society although it could appeal to adults with teenagers in sports, warning them of the dangers. It's not necessary to fully understand football to understand his argument though a little knowledge does help. McMurtry's comparison of sports to war and sports to the business world helps the reader understand the viciousness of the game.
4. Consider the language of football, especially the words shared by the military. What sports other than football have a militaristic side?
All sports have somewhat of a militaristic side. All have a coach who gives out orders and gives long speeches. All require self discipline and lots of training, though some, like track and gymnastics,are less violent and are more about self than defeating an opponent. Other sports, like hockey, are as equally violent as football, as any northerner can tell you.
McMurty's anecdote lends ethos to his argument as he his played "college and professional football" and now "[has] to don a brace" and his brother "an outstanding football player in college" had to "[undergo] spinal surgery." This personal experience aren't just "isolated experiences" but are common and are the consequence of football, lending credibility to the argument.
2. McMurtry also addresses the argument that games such as football allow us to discharge our "original-sin urge into less harmful channels than, say, war" (para. 15). Cite passages where McMurtry counters this arugment. Do you agree with him? Why or why not?
McMurtry "[sees] little to recommend such a view" that sports are a more peaceful channel. "organized football" only "[suppressed his] natural urges" and express them in "an alienating, violent for." While football can often be a good energy outlet, it often takes peaceful men and turns them into mean, crushing machines.
3. Who is McMurtry's audience? Is it necessary for the reader to understand or care about football in order to understand what McMurtry is saying about society? Explain.
McMurtry's argument could be directed at most anyone is society although it could appeal to adults with teenagers in sports, warning them of the dangers. It's not necessary to fully understand football to understand his argument though a little knowledge does help. McMurtry's comparison of sports to war and sports to the business world helps the reader understand the viciousness of the game.
4. Consider the language of football, especially the words shared by the military. What sports other than football have a militaristic side?
All sports have somewhat of a militaristic side. All have a coach who gives out orders and gives long speeches. All require self discipline and lots of training, though some, like track and gymnastics,are less violent and are more about self than defeating an opponent. Other sports, like hockey, are as equally violent as football, as any northerner can tell you.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)